Apple threatens to sue Tidal over Drake performance [updated]

drake

Apple threatened to sue rival streaming service Tidal over Drake’s appearance at Lil WeezyAna Fest, reports the New York Post. The festival, which took place in New Orleans on Friday night, is put on by Drake’s friend and record label associate Lil Wayne, and the proceeds go to his charity.

According to The Post, lawyers were called in because the event was being streamed via Tidal, and Drake has an exclusive deal with Apple Music. That deal is said to be worth as much as $20 million, which is what Apple threatened to sue Tidal for if he or his music appeared on the live stream.... Read the rest of this post here


"Apple threatens to sue Tidal over Drake performance [updated]" is an article by iDownloadBlog.com.
Make sure to follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Google+.

Official: Samsung stole trade secrets from TSMC

Apple A9 (mockup 002)

Samsung lifted trade secrets from rival Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC), the world’s #1 independent semiconductor foundry, Taiwan’s top court has ruled.

According to a report published Wednesday by Taiwanese trade publication DigiTimes, the court has determined that Liang Mong-song, a former senior director of research and development at TSMC, revealed TSMC’s trade secrets and patents related to its advanced FinFET process technology to Samsung Electronics.

The report makes no mention of Apple, but the connection couldn’t be clearer: Samsung might have been able to leverage the stolen secrets to win orders for Apple’s next-generation ‘A9′ processor. Prior reports have posited that both Samsung and TSMC got to build Apple’s A9 chips on the advanced 14-nanometer FinFET process technology which uses entirely new three-dimensional transistors.... Read the rest of this post here


"Official: Samsung stole trade secrets from TSMC" is an article by iDownloadBlog.com.
Make sure to follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Google+.

Court denies Samsung’s latest appeal request in ongoing patent case

courtroom gavel

The US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday denied Samsung’s request to reconsider the court’s decision to uphold damages awarded in its patent infringement case, reports the San Jose Mercury News. The damages amount to more than $400 million.

This is just the latest turn in what seems to be a never-ending patent case between Samsung and Apple. In 2012, a jury found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple’s patents and awarded the iPhone maker $1 billion in damages, which has since been cut in half.... Read the rest of this post here


"Court denies Samsung’s latest appeal request in ongoing patent case" is an article by iDownloadBlog.com.
Make sure to follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Google+.

Apple and Nike work out settlement terms for FuelBand lawsuit

Nike is ready to pay up to get a two-year-old FuelBand-related class action lawsuit off its back. The case filed back in 2013 against Nike and Apple claimed that there were some "false and/or misleading statements" in the wearable's ads about its ability to track calories and steps accurately, as well as breach of warranty. While the companies maintain that they did nothing wrong, Nike has decided to settle the issue -- it's now offering class members a choice between a $15 cash payout and a $25 gift card redeemable in its US, Puerto Rico and online stores. Apple, which stopped selling FuelBand and other wearables earlier this year, won't be shelling out a single cent.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Via: MacRumors

Source: Nike+ FuelBand Settement

China nails Samsung and Oppo over smartphone bloatware

Germany Gadget Show Samsung

A minor Chinese consumer protection group has filed lawsuits against Samsung and Oppo to contest the pair's use of bloatware on their smartphones. The Shanghai Consumer Council believes that the two companies install far too many additional apps on their devices and then make it difficult for them to be easily removed. The group says that it was motivated to launch the legal broadside after a high number of complaints from users. It believes that people are aggrieved that they've got less storage space than expected, and that these apps slurp down excessive quantities of data.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Via: Shanghai Daily, BBC News

Source: China Consumers Association, (2)

Apple loses final appeal in e-books price-fixing suit, will pay $450 million fine

courtroom gavel

A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld a 2013 decision finding Apple guilty for conspiring with publishers to raise e-book prices, reports The Wall Street Journal. As a result, the company is expected to pay a $450 million settlement it agreed to with private plaintiffs, 30+ states and the DOJ last year.

“We conclude that the district court correctly decided that Apple orchestrated a conspiracy among the publishers to raise e-book prices,” wrote Second Circuit Judge Debra Ann Livingston. The conspiracy “unreasonably restrained trade” in violation of the Sherman Act, the federal antitrust law, she wrote.... Read the rest of this post here


"Apple loses final appeal in e-books price-fixing suit, will pay $450 million fine" is an article by iDownloadBlog.com.
Make sure to follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Google+.

Supreme Court won’t touch Google’s fight with Oracle over Android

Rock 'em Sock 'em Robots, er, Androids

When Oracle got a second chance at making Google pay for using Java programming kits in Android, the folks in Mountain View raced to the Supreme Court in hopes of stopping that renewed lawsuit dead in its tracks. Unfortunately for Google, that's not going to happen -- the Supreme Court now says that it won't tackle the case. The move kicks the issue back to a lower court, and denies a once-and-for-all decision on the extent to which companies can copyright their code. This doesn't necessarily mean that Google will be on the hook for Android, but the company is going to face a tougher fight than it wanted.

[Image credit: CSA Images/Getty Images]

Filed under: , , , ,

Comments

Source: Wall Street Journal

Apple pulls Monster’s MFi license following Beats lawsuit

beats colors 1

Apple has revoked Monster’s MFi license in wake of its Beats lawsuit, reports The Wall Street Journal. Monster, the A/V company who manufactured headphones for Beats in its early days, filed a lawsuit against the company in January for duping it out of potential proceeds from the Apple acquisition.

Monster’s general counsel David Tognotti said Apple’s move to pull its MFi license is in retribution for the suit, and that it can significantly disrupt their business—which still involves building premium headphones. “It shows a side of Apple that consumers don’t see very often,” he said. “Apple can be a bully.”... Read the rest of this post here


"Apple pulls Monster’s MFi license following Beats lawsuit" is an article by iDownloadBlog.com.
Make sure to follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Google+.

Typo’s truce with BlackBerry stops it from selling phone keyboards

Typo keyboard for iPhone 5 and 5s

Typo started fending off lawsuits from BlackBerry almost as soon as its lookalike iPhone keyboards went on sale, but it's at last getting a break... well, sort of. The Ryan Seacrest-backed company has reached a settlement with BlackBerry that ends all lawsuits, but requires that it "permanently discontinue" selling keyboards for any device with a screen 7.9 inches or smaller (that is, phones). Effectively, the crew in Waterloo is asking Typo to drop its very reason for being -- it was formed by executives who wanted to ditch their BlackBerrys for iPhones without having to type on glass. While Typo will stick around and sell iPad keyboards, there's no doubt that it's a shell of its former self.

Filed under: , , ,

Comments

Via: N4BB

Source: BlackBerry

Apple’s $930 million legal win over Samsung gets partially reversed

The Great Apple/Samsung Legal Throwdown of 2012 ultimately resulted in the Korean company having to pay a whopping $930 million in damages for violating Apple intellectual property... or it did, until this morning. A Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruled earlier today that while Samsung did indeed violate Apple's design patents, it didn't do the with same Apple's trade dress - broader elements of design and aesthetic that dictate the presentation of Apple's gadgets. With that bombshell dropped, the court has asked for an update on the damages to be awarded sans the trade dress stuff, which should work out to a roughly $382 million discount for Samsung.

Filed under:

Comments

Source: Reuters